Cold Stamped or Hot Formed? Part II

Blog, homepage-featured-top, main-blog

Grade Options and Corrosion Protection Considerations When Deciding How A Part Gets Formed

Automakers contemplating whether a part is cold stamped or hot formed must consider numerous ramifications impacting multiple departments.  Our prior blog on this topic highlighted the equipment differences and the property development differences between each approach.  We continue this blog series, now focusing on grade options and corrosion protection. 

The discussions below relative to cold stamping are applicable to any forming operation occurring at room temperature such as roll forming, hydroforming, or conventional stamping. Similarly, hot stamping refers to any set of operations using Press Hardening Steels (or Press Quenched Steels), including those that are roll formed or fluid-formed.  

Grade Options for Cold Stamped or Hot Formed Steel 

There are two types of parts needed for vehicle safety cage applications: those with the highest strength that prevent intrusion, and those with some additional ductility that can help with energy absorption.  Each of these types can be achieved via cold stamping or hot stamping. 

When it comes to cold stamped parts, many grade options exist at 1000 MPa that also have decent ductility.  The advent of the 3rd Generation Advanced High Strength Steels adds to the tally. Most of these top out at 1200 MPa, with some companies offering cold-formable Advanced High Strength Steels with 1400 or 1500 MPa tensile strength.  The chemistry of AHSS grades is a function of the specific characteristics of each production mill, meaning that OEMs must exercise diligence when changing suppliers. 

 

Figure 1: Stress-strain curve of industrially produced QP980.^W-35

Martensitic grades from the steel mill have been in commercial production for many years, with minimum strength levels typically ranging from 900 MPa to 1470 MPa, depending on the grade. These products are typically destined for roll forming, except for possibly those at the lower strengths, due to limited ductility.  Until recently, MS1470, a martensitic steel with 1470 MPa minimum tensile strength, was the highest strength cold formable option available. New offerings from global steelmakers now include MS1700, with a 1700 MPa minimum tensile strength, as well as MS 1470 with sufficient ductility to allow for cold stamping.  Automakers have deployed these grades in cold stamped applications such as crossmembers and roof reinforcements. 

Figure 2: Cold-Stamped Martensitic Steel with 1500 MPa Tensile Strength used in the Nissan B-Segment Hatchback.^K-57

Until these recent developments, hot stamping was the primary option to reach the highest strength levels in part shapes having even mild complexity.  Under proper conditions, a chemistry of 22MnB5 could routinely reach a nominal or aim strength of 1500 MPa, which led to this grade being described as PHS1500, CR1500T-MB, or with similar nomenclature.  Note that in this terminology, 1500 MPa nominal strength typically corresponds to a minimum strength of 1300 MPa.  

The 22MnB5 chemistry is globally available, but the coating approaches discussed below may be company-specific. 

Newer PHS options with a modified chemistry and subsequent processing differences can reach nominal strength levels of 2000 MPa.  Other options are available with additional ductility at strength levels of 1000 MPa or 1200 MPa. A special class called Press Quenched Steels have even higher ductility with strength as low as 450 MPa.   

The spectrum of grades available for cold-stamped and hot formed steel parts allows automakers to fine-tune the crash energy management features within a body structure, contributing to steel’s “infinite tune-ability” capability which gives automotive engineers design flexibility and freedoms not available from other structural materials. 

Corrosion Protection 

Uncoated versions of a grade must take a different chemistry approach than the hot dip galvanized (GI) or hot dipped galvannealed (HDGA) versions since the hot dip galvanizing process acts as a heat treatment cycle that changes the properties of the base steel.  Steelmakers adjust the base steel chemistry to account for this heat treatment to ensure the resultant properties fall within the grade requirements. 

Figure 3:  Schematic of a typical hot-dipped galvanizing line with galvanneal capability.

This strategy has limitations as it relates to grades with increasing amounts of martensite in the microstructure. Complex thermal cycles are needed to produce the highly engineered microstructures seen in advanced steels.  Above a certain strength level, it is not possible to create a GI or HDGA version of that grade. 

For example, when discussing fully martensitic grades from the steel mill, hot dip galvanizing is not an option.  If a martensitic grade needs corrosion protection, then electrogalvanizing is the common approach since an EG coating is applied at ambient temperature, which is low enough to avoid negatively impacting the properties. Automakers might choose to forgo a galvanized coating if the intended application is in a dry area that is not exposed to road salt. 

Figure 4: Schematic of an electrogalvanizing line. 

For press hardening steels, coatings serve multiple purposes.  Without a coating, uncoated steels will oxidize in the austenitizing furnace and develop scale on the surface.  During hot stamping, this scale layer limits efficient thermal transfer and may prevent the critical cooling rate from being reached. Furthermore, scale may flake off in the tooling, leading to tool surface damage.  Finally, scale remaining after hot stamping is typically removed by shot blasting, an off-line operation that may induce additional issues. 

Using a hot dip galvanized steel in a conventional direct press hardening process (blank -> heat -> form/quench) may contribute to liquid metal embrittlement (LME).  Getting around this requires either changing the steel chemistry from the conventional 22MnB5 or using an indirect press hardening process that sees the bulk of the part shape formed at ambient temperatures followed by heating and quenching. 

Those companies wishing to use the direct press hardening process can use a base steel having an aluminum-silicon (Al-Si) coating, providing that the heating cycle in the austenitizing furnace is such that there is sufficient time for alloying between the coating and the base steel. Welding practices using these coated steels need to account for the aluminum in the coating, but robust practices have been developed and are in widespread use.  

For more information about PHS grades and processing, see our Press Hardened Steel Primer. 

Danny Schaeffler is the Metallurgy and Forming Technical Editor of the AHSS Applications Guidelines available from WorldAutoSteel. He is founder and President of Engineering Quality Solutions (EQS). Danny wrote the monthly “Science of Forming” and “Metal Matters” column for Metalforming Magazine, and provides seminars on sheet metal formability for Auto/Steel Partnership and the Precision Metalforming Association. He has written for Stamping Journal and The Fabricator, and has lectured at FabTech. Danny is passionate about training new and experienced employees at manufacturing companies about how sheet metal properties impact their forming success.