![Defining Steels]()
Metallurgy
Basis
There are different ways to classify automotive steels. One is a metallurgical designation providing some process information. Common designations include lower-strength steels (interstitial-free and mild steels); conventional high strength steels, such as bake hardenable and high-strength, low-alloy steels (HSLA); and Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS) such as dual phase and transformation-induced plasticity steels. Additional higher strength steels include press hardening steels and steels designed for unique applications that have improved edge stretch and stretch bending characteristics.
A second classification method important to part designers is strength of the steel. This document will use the general terms HSLA and AHSS to designate all higher strength steels. The principal difference between conventional HSLA steels and AHSS is their microstructure. Conventional HSLA steels are single-phase ferritic steels with a potential for some pearlite in C-Mn steels. AHSS are primarily steels with a multiphase microstructure containing one or more phases other than ferrite, pearlite, or cementite – for example martensite, bainite, austenite, and/or retained austenite in quantities sufficient to produce unique mechanical properties. Some types of AHSS have a higher strain hardening capacity resulting in a strength-ductility balance superior to conventional steels. Other types have ultra-high yield and tensile strengths and show a bake hardening behavior.
AHSS include all martensitic and multiphase steels having a minimum specified tensile strength of at least 440 MPa. Those steels with very high minimum specified tensile strength are sometimes referred to as Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS). Several companies choose 980 MPa as the threshold where “Ultra” high strength begins, while others use higher thresholds of 1180 MPa or 1270 MPa. There is no generally accepted definition among the producers or users of the product. The difference between AHSS and UHSS is in terminology only – they are not separate products. The actions taken by the manufacturing community to form, join, or process is ultimately a function of the steel grade, thickness, and mechanical properties. Whether these steels are called “Advanced” or “Ultra” does not impact the technical response.
Third Generation, or 3rd Gen, AHSS builds on the previously developed 1st Gen AHSS (DP, TRIP, CP, MS, and PHS) and 2nd Gen AHSS (TWIP), with global commercialization starting around 2020. 3rd Gen AHSS are multi-phase steels engineered to develop enhanced formability as measured in tensile, sheared edge, and/or bending tests. Typically, these steels rely on retained austenite in a bainite or martensite matrix and potentially some amount of ferrite and/or precipitates, all in specific proportions and distributions, to develop these enhanced properties.
Nomenclature
Historically, HSLA steels were described by their minimum yield strength. Depending on the region, the units may have been ksi or MPa, meaning that HSLA 50 and HSLA 340 both describe a High Strength Low Alloy steel with a minimum yield strength of 50 ksi = 50,000 psi ≈ 340 MPa. Although not possible to tell from this syntax, many of the specifications stated that the minimum tensile strength was 70 MPa to 80 MPa greater than the minimum yield strength.
Development of the initial AHSS grades evolved such that they were described by their metallurgical approach and minimum tensile strength, such as using DP590 to describe a dual phase steel with 590 MPa tensile strength. Furthermore, when Advanced High Strength Steels were first commercialized, there was often only one option for a given metallurgical type and tensile strength level. Now, for example, there are multiple distinct dual phase grades with a minimum 980 MPa tensile strength, each with different yield strength or formability.
To highlight these different characteristics throughout this website, each steel grade is identified by whether it is hot rolled or cold rolled, minimum yield strength (in MPa), minimum tensile strength (in MPa), and metallurgical type. Table 1 lists different types of steels.
Table 1: Different Types of Steels and Associated Abbreviations.
As an example, CR-500Y780T-DP describes a cold rolled dual phase steel with 500 MPa minimum yield strength and 780 MPa minimum ultimate tensile strength. There is also another grade with the same minimum UTS, but lower yield strength: CR440Y780T-DP. If the syntax is simply DP780, the reader should assume either that the referenced study did not distinguish between the variants or that the issues described in that section applies to all variants of a dual phase steel with a minimum 780 MPa tensile strength.
Another syntax issue is the presentation of the strength (yield or tensile), and whether it is rounded to the nearest 10 or 50 MPa. For example, consider DP980 compared with DP1000. Both forms represent essentially the same grade. In Europe, this steel may be described as having a tensile strength of 100 kgf/mm2, corresponding to 981 N/mm2 (981 MPa), and expressed as DP980. In Asia, the steel may be referred to as 100K (an abbreviation for 100 kgf/mm2). In other parts of the world, it may be rounded to nearest 50 MPa, as DP 1000. This naming approach applies to many grades, with some shown in Table 2. In some cases, although the OEM specification may list the steel as DP800 (for example), the minimum tensile strength requirement may still be 780 MPa. Furthermore, independent of the chosen naming syntax, the steel company will supply to the actual specification requirements, and will use different process controls to meet a 780 MPa minimum compared with an 800 MPa minimum.
Table 2: Syntax Related to AHSS Strength Levels
Press hardening steels sometimes require a different syntax. Some OEMs will use a similar terminology as described above. For example: CR-950Y1300T-PH (PH stands for Press Hardenable or Press Hardened) or CR-950Y1300T-MB (MB stands for Manganese-Boron steel) can describe the same cold rolled press hardening steel with 950 MPa minimum yield strength and 1300 MPa minimum tensile strength after completing the press hardening operation. Other specifications may show suffixes which highlight the forming process used, such as -DS for direct hot stamping, -IS for indirect hot stamping and MS for a multi-step process. Furthermore, sources may describe this product focused on its typical tensile strength as PHS1500T. The abbreviation PQS (Press Quenched Steel) is typically used for grades that do not harden after hot stamping. These may be noted as PQS450 and PQS550, where the numbers stand for the approximate minimum tensile strength after the hot stamping cycle (see the section on Grades With Higher Ductility on the linked page).
Graphical Presentation
Generally, elongation (a measure of ductility) decreases as strength increases. Plotting elongation on the vertical axis and strength on the horizontal axis leads to a graph starting in the upper left (high elongation, lower strength) and progressing to the lower right (lower elongation, higher strength). This shape led to the colloquial description of calling this the banana diagram.
Figure 1: A generic “banana” diagram comparing strength and elongation.
With the continued development of advanced steel options, it is no longer appropriate to describe the plethora of options as being in the shape of a banana. Instead, with new grades filling the upper right portion (see Figure 2), perhaps it is more accurate to describe this as the football diagram as the options now start to fall into the shape of an American or Rugby Football. Officially, it is known as the steel Global Formability Diagram.
Even this approach has its limitations. Elongation is only one measure of ductility. Other ductility parameters are increasingly important with AHSS grades, such as hole expansion and bendability. BillurB-61 proposed a diagram comparing the bend angle determined from the VDA238-100 testV-4 with the yield strength for various press hardened and press quenched steels.
Figure 3: VDA Bending Angle typically decreases with increasing yield strength of PHS/PQS grades.B-61
Figure 4 shows a local/global formability map sometimes referred to as the Hance Diagram named after the researcher who proposed it.H-16 This diagram combines measures of local formability (characterized by true fracture strain) and global formability (characterized by uniform elongation), providing insight on different characteristics associated with many steel grades and helping with application-specific material grade selection. For example, if good trim conditions still create edge splits, selecting materials higher on the vertical axis may help address the edge-cracking problems. Likewise, global formability necking or splitting issues can be solved by using grades further to the right on the horizontal axis.
Figure 4: The Local/Global Formability Map combines measures of local formability (true fracture strain) and global formability (uniform elongation) to highlight the relative characteristics of different grades. In this version from Citation D-12, the colors distinguish different options at each tensile strength level.
Grade Portfolio
Previous AHSS Application Guidelines showcased a materials portfolio driven by the FutureSteelVehicle (FSV) program, with more than twenty new grades of AHSS acknowledged as commercially available by 2020. The AHSS materials portfolio continues to grow, as the steel industry responds to requirements for high strength, lightweight steels. Table 3 reflects available AHSS grades as well as grades under development and nearing commercial application. The Steel Grades page provides details about these grades and their applications.
Table 3: Commercially available AHSS Grades and grades under development for near-term application.
Grade names shown in Italicized Bold were available in FutureSteelVehicle.
For all but PQS/PHS, Grade Name indicates the minimum yield strength, minimum tensile strength, and the type of AHSS.
PQS/PHS grade name indicates nominal tensile strength.
The min EL column indicates a typical minimum total elongation value, which may vary based on test sample shape, gauge length, and thickness.
The typ λ column indicates a typical hole expansion percentage, which may vary based on test sample diameter, punch shape, edge preparation techniques, and several other factors.
Zinc coatings may lower these hole expansion values by 10%-15%.
The ISO 16630 test for hole expansion is known to produce results with more scatter than desired.
Globally, many companies and consortia are attempting to converge on a robust edge stretch characterization procedure that produces meaningful results without undue scatter.
See the pages on Edge Stretch Characterization for more information.
You are advised to contact your steel supplier for specific guidance on the products available and the associated properties.
Global automakers create steel specification criteria suited for their vehicle targets, manufacturing infrastructure, and other constraints. Although similar specifications exist at other companies, perfect overlap of all specifications is unlikely. Global steelmakers have different equipment, production capabilities, and commercial availability.
Minimum or typical mechanical properties shown on this web page and throughout this site illustrates the broad range of AHSS grades that may be available. Properties of hot rolled steels can differ from cold rolled steels. Coating processes like hot dip galvanizing or galvannealing subjects the base metal to different thermal cycles that affect final properties. Test procedures and requirements have a regional or OEM influence, such as preference to using tensile test gauge length of 50 mm or 80 mm, or specifying minimum property values parallel or perpendicular to the rolling direction.
Steel users must communicate directly with individual steel companies to determine specific grade availability and the specific associated parameters and properties, such as:
- Chemical composition specifications,
- Mechanical properties and ranges,
- Thickness and width capabilities,
- Hot-rolled, cold-rolled, and coating availability,
- Joining characteristics.
1stGen AHSS, AHSS, Steel Grades
Dual Phase (DP) steels have a microstructure consisting of a ferritic matrix with martensitic islands as a hard second phase, shown schematically in Figure 1. The soft ferrite phase is generally continuous, giving these steels excellent ductility. When these steels deform, strain is concentrated in the lower-strength ferrite phase surrounding the islands of martensite, creating the unique high initial work-hardening rate (n-value) exhibited by these steels. Figure 2 is a micrograph showing the ferrite and martensite constituents.
Figure 1: Schematic of a Dual Phase steel microstructure showing islands of martensite in a matrix of ferrite.
Figure 2: Micrograph of Dual Phase Steel
Hot rolled DP steels do not have the benefit of an annealing cycle, so the dual phase microstructure must be achieved by controlled cooling from the austenite phase after exiting the hot strip mill finishing stands and before coiling. This typically requires a more highly alloyed chemistry than cold rolled DP steels require. Higher alloying is generally associated with a change in welding practices.
In one possible approach, after exiting the last finishing stand of the hot rolling mill, controlled cooling facilitates the nucleation of ferrite. Then a more rapid cooling fast enough to avoid bainite formation is needed to reach the Ms (martensite start) temperature and begin nucleating martensite from the austenite that had not transformed to ferrite.
Continuously annealed cold-rolled and hot-dip coated Dual Phase steels are produced by controlled cooling from the two-phase ferrite plus austenite (α + γ) region to transform some austenite to ferrite before a rapid cooling transforms the remaining austenite to martensite. Due to the production process, small amounts of other phases (bainite and retained austenite) may be present.
Higher strength dual phase steels are typically achieved by increasing the martensite volume fraction. Depending on the composition and process route, steels requiring enhanced capability to resist cracking on a stretched edge (as typically measured by hole expansion capacity) can have a microstructure containing significant quantities of bainite.
The work hardening rate plus excellent elongation creates DP steels with much higher ultimate tensile strengths than conventional steels of similar yield strength. Figure 3 compares the engineering stress-strain curve for HSLA steel to a DP steel curve of similar yield strength. The DP steel exhibits higher initial work hardening rate, higher ultimate tensile strength, and lower YS/TS ratio than the HSLA with comparable yield strength. Additional engineering and true stress-strain curves for DP steel grades are presented in Figures 4 and 5.
Figure 3: A comparison of stress strain curves for mild steel, HSLA 350/450, and DP 350/600K-1
Figure 4: Engineering stress-strain curves for a series of DP steel grades.S-5, V-1 Sheet thicknesses: DP 250/450 and DP 500/800 = 1.0mm. All other steels were 1.8-2.0mm.
Figure 5: True stress-strain curves for a series of DP steel grades.S-5, V-1 Sheet thicknesses: DP 250/450 and DP 500/800 = 1.0mm. All other steels were 1.8-2.0mm.
The volume fraction, morphology, and distribution of the martensite in the ferrite matrix is responsible for the mechanical properties of dual phase (DP) steels. The intercritical annealing temperature, cooling rate, and alloy content affect the martensite volume fraction in the finished product.
Martensite can have different appearances (morphologies) in the microstructure including needle-like, granular, and equiaxed, and these impact the strength and ductility of DP steels. The most favorable balance of strength and ductility usually is associated with a uniform distribution of equiaxed martensite islands.
These properties influence the hole expansion ratio, which measures the expandability of a sheared edge. The amount of carbon in martensite controls martensite hardness relative to the ferrite, and a greater hardness difference between martensite and ferrite is associated with decreased HER values.
The number of martensite colonies per unit area has a positive correlation with sheared edge stretchability, indicating that there is a greater dispersion of these islands of this high-hardness phase. A more homogeneous microstructure is known to have better HER and sheared-edge formability properties.T-57.
Although dual phase steels are more formable than HSLA steels at the same tensile strength, there is a greater risk of cut edge fractures forming and propagating during stretch flanging. This is due to the hardness difference between the ferrite and martensite phases.
In these steels, micro-voids form at the interface between the soft phase and hard phase at the sheared edge (Figure 6), and can fracture during flanging under tension. Reducing the hardness difference of the microstructural components is one approach to improve edge fracture resistance, which is one of the merits of using complex phase steels.
Figure 6: Microstructure at the punched edge of a DP steel.M-75
DP and other AHSS also have a bake hardening effect that is an important benefit compared to conventional higher strength steels. The extent of the bake hardening effect in AHSS depends on an adequate amount of forming strain for the specific chemistry and thermal history of the steel.
In DP steels, carbon enables the formation of martensite at practical cooling rates by increasing the hardenability of the steel. Manganese, chromium, molybdenum, vanadium, and nickel, added individually or in combination, also help increase hardenability. Carbon also strengthens the martensite as a ferrite solute strengthener, as do silicon and phosphorus. These additions are carefully balanced, not only to produce unique mechanical properties, but also to maintain the generally good resistance spot welding capability. However, when welding the higher strength grades (DP 700/1000 and above) to themselves, the spot weldability may require adjustments to the welding practice.
Dual Phase Steel for Exposed Panels
In recent decades, bake hardenable steels have been a common choice for outer surface panels. Many of these applications center around grades with yield strength of approximately 200 MPa and tensile strength below approximately 400 MPa. Work hardening (strengthening occurring from forming) combined with bake hardening (strengthening from the paint curing cycle during automotive production) usually adds around 70 to 100 MPa to the yield strength, enhancing the dent resistance of these panels.
To further support the lightweighting efforts of the automobile industry, steelmakers have developed dual phase steels with appropriate surface characteristics for exposed panel applications. The benefits of deploying dual phase steels in these applications include a higher yield strength from the steel mill (300 MPa minimum yield strength) and a greater strengthening increase from bake hardening (typically more than 100 MPa) in addition to the work hardening from forming. The strengthening increase allows the automaker to downgauge the sheet thickness to as low as 0.55 mm and maintain adequate dent resistance. More information on the bake hardenability of exposed quality dual phase steels can be found here.
The primary grade in this category can be described as HC300/500DPD+Z, where HC indicates that it is high strength cold rolled steel, 300/500 represents the minimum yield and tensile strength in MPa, DPD is “dual phase deep drawing,” and Z indicates that it is galvanized.
The stress-strain curves of HC300/500DPD+Z are compared with those of common traditional bake hardening grades used for automotive outer skin panels in Figures 7 and 8. The comparison of engineering stress-strain curves are shown in Figure 7, with Figure 8 comparing the true stress-strain curves.
The dual phase steel exhibits a higher tensile strength and greater work hardening (n-value) – especially in the 4% to 6% range that coincides with the strain range associated with stamping automotive outer panels.
Figure 7: Engineering stress-strain curves for 0.6 mm HC300Y/500T-DPD+Z (galvanized 500 DP in red), 0.75 mm HC220BD+Z (galvanized 220 BH in blue), and 0.65 mm HC180BD+Z (galvanized 180 BH in black).
Figure 8: True stress-strain curves for 0.6 mm HC300Y/500T-DPD+Z (galvanized 500 DP in red), 0.75 mm HC220BD+Z (galvanized 220 BH in blue), and 0.65 mm HC180BD+Z (galvanized 180 BH in black).
Figure 9 compares the forming limit curve for HC300/500DPD+Z steel to those of the typical bake hardenable grades. The dual phase grade has comparable to slightly less necking resistance than HC220BD+Z, a bake hardenable steel with 220 MPa minimum tensile strength. The necking resistance of HC180BD+Z is greater than both other grades.
Figure 9: Forming limit curves for 0.6 mm HC300Y/500T-DPD+Z (galvanized 500 DP in red), 0.75 mm HC220BD+Z (galvanized 220 BH in blue), and 0.65 mm HC180BD+Z (galvanized 180 BH in black).
While the thickness reduction offered by HC300/500DPD+Z benefits lightweighting, there is also an associated loss of stiffness. This reduced stiffness typically limits how thin automakers will specify for surface panels, rather than steel mill capabilities.
However, the lower stiffness, higher yield strength, and lower formability negatively influence dimensional accuracy and may contribute to welding challenges. Many of these challenges can be addressed virtually using metal forming simulation.
Examples of current production grades of DP steels and typical automotive applications include:
| DP 300/500 |
Roof outer, door outer, body side outer, package tray, floor panel |
| DP 350/600 |
Floor panel, hood outer, body side outer, cowl, fender, floor reinforcements |
| DP 500/800 |
Body side inner, quarter panel inner, rear rails, rear shock reinforcements |
| DP 600/980 |
Safety cage components (B-pillar, floor panel tunnel, engine cradle, front sub-frame package tray, shotgun, seat) |
| DP 700/1000 |
Roof rails |
| DP 800/1180 |
B-Pillar upper |
Some of the specifications describing uncoated cold rolled 1st Generation dual phase (DP) steel are included below, with the grades typically listed in order of increasing minimum tensile strength and ductility. Different specifications may exist which describe hot or cold rolled, uncoated or coated, or steels of different strengths. Many automakers have proprietary specifications which encompass their requirements.
- ASTM A1088, with the terms Dual phase (DP) steel Grades 440T/250Y, 490T/290Y, 590T/340Y, 780T/420Y, and 980T/550YA-22
- EN 10338, with the terms HCT450X, HCT490X, HCT590X, HCT780X, HCT980X, HCT980XG, and HCT1180XD-6
- JIS G3135, with the terms SPFC490Y, SPFC540Y, SPFC590Y, SPFC780Y and SPFC980YJ-3
- JFS A2001, with the terms JSC590Y, JSC780Y, JSC980Y, JSC980YL, JSC980YH, JSC1180Y, JSC1180YL, and JSC1180YHJ-23
- VDA 239-100, with the terms CR290Y490T-DP, CR330Y590T-DP, CR440Y780T-DP, CR590Y980T-DP, and CR700Y980T-DPV-3
- SAE J2745, with terms Dual Phase (DP) 440T/250Y, 490T/290Y, 590T/340Y, 6907/550Y, 780T/420Y, and 980T/550YS-18
1stGen AHSS, 3rdGen AHSS, AHSS, Steel Grades
topofpage
The microstructure of Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) steels contains a matrix of ferrite, with retained austenite, martensite, and bainite present in varying amounts. Production of TRIP steels typically requires the use of an isothermal hold at an intermediate temperature, which produces some bainite. Higher silicon and carbon content of TRIP steels result in significant volume fractions of retained austenite in the final microstructure. Figure 1 shows a schematic of TRIP steel microstructure, with Figure 2 showing a micrograph of an actual sample of TRIP steel. Figure 3 compares the engineering stress-strain curve for HSLA steel to a TRIP steel curve of similar yield strength.
Figure 1: Schematic of a TRIP steel microstructure showing a matrix of ferrite, with martensite, bainite and retained austenite as the additional phases.
Figure 2: Micrograph of Transformation Induced Plasticity steel.
Figure 3: A comparison of stress strain curves for mild steel, HSLA 350/450, and TRIP 350/600.K-1
During deformation, the dispersion of hard second phases in soft ferrite creates a high work hardening rate, as observed in the DP steels. However, in TRIP steels the retained austenite also progressively transforms to martensite with increasing strain, thereby increasing the work hardening rate at higher strain levels. This is known as the TRIP Effect. This is illustrated in Figure 4, which compares the engineering stress-strain behavior of HSLA, DP and TRIP steels of nominally the same yield strength. The TRIP steel has a lower initial work hardening rate than the DP steel, but the hardening rate persists at higher strains where work hardening of the DP begins to diminish. Additional engineering and true stress-strain curves for TRIP steel grades are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 4: TRIP 350/600 with a greater total elongation than DP 350/600 and HSLA 350/450. K-1
Figure 5: Engineering stress-strain (left graphic) and true stress-strain (right graphic) curves for a series of TRIP steel grades. Sheet thickness: TRIP 350/600 = 1.2mm, TRIP 450/700 = 1.5mm, TRIP 500/750 = 2.0mm, and Mild Steel = approx. 1.9mm. V-1
The strain hardening response of TRIP steels are substantially higher than for conventional HSS, resulting in significantly improved formability in stretch deformation. This response is indicated by a comparison of the n-value for the grades. The improvement in stretch formability is particularly useful when designers take advantage of the improved strain hardening response to design a part utilizing the as-formed mechanical properties. High n-value persists to higher strains in TRIP steels, providing a slight advantage over DP in the most severe stretch forming applications.
Austenite is a higher temperature phase and is not stable at room temperature under equilibrium conditions. Along with a specific thermal cycle, carbon content greater than that used in DP steels are needed in TRIP steels to promote room-temperature stabilization of austenite. Retained austenite is the term given to the austenitic phase that is stable at room temperature.
Higher contents of silicon and/or aluminum accelerate the ferrite/bainite formation. These elements assist in maintaining the necessary carbon content within the retained austenite. Suppressing the carbide precipitation during bainitic transformation appears to be crucial for TRIP steels. Silicon and aluminum are used to avoid carbide precipitation in the bainite region.
The carbon level of the TRIP alloy alters the strain level at which the TRIP Effect occurs. The strain level at which retained austenite begins to transform to martensite is controlled by adjusting the carbon content. At lower carbon levels, retained austenite begins to transform almost immediately upon deformation, increasing the work hardening rate and formability during the stamping process. At higher carbon contents, retained austenite is more stable and begins to transform only at strain levels beyond those produced during forming. At these carbon levels, retained austenite transforms to martensite during subsequent deformation, such as a crash event.
TRIP steels therefore can be engineered to provide excellent formability for manufacturing complex AHSS parts or to exhibit high strain hardening during crash deformation resulting in excellent crash energy absorption.
The additional alloying requirements of TRIP steels degrade their resistance spot-welding behavior. This can be addressed through weld cycle modification, such as the use of pulsating welding or dilution welding. Table 1 provides a list of current production grades of TRIP steels and example automotive applications:
Table 1: Current Production Grades Of TRIP Steels And Example Automotive Applications.
Some of the specifications describing uncoated cold rolled 1st Generation transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) steel are included below, with the grades typically listed in order of increasing minimum tensile strength and ductility. Different specifications may exist which describe hot or cold rolled, uncoated or coated, or steels of different strengths. Many automakers have proprietary specifications which encompass their requirements.
• ASTM A1088, with the terms Transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) steel Grades 690T/410Y and 780T/440YA-22
• JFS A2001, with the terms JSC590T and JSC780TJ-23
• EN 10338, with the terms HCT690T and HCT780TD-18
• VDA 239-100, with the terms CR400Y690T-TR and CR450Y780T-TRV-3
• SAE J2745, with terms Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) 590T/380Y, 690T/400Y, and 780T/420YS-18
Transformation Induced Plasticity Effect
Austenite is not stable at room temperature under equilibrium conditions. An austenitic microstructure is retained at room temperature with the combined use of a specific chemistry and controlled thermal cycle.
Deformation from sheet forming or from crash impact provides the necessary energy to allow the crystallographic structure to change from austenite to martensite. There is insufficient time and temperature for substantial diffusion of carbon to occur from carbon-rich austenite, which results in a high-carbon (high strength) martensite after transformation. Strengthening also occurs from the dislocations formed in the adjacent ferrite required to accommodate the volume increase associated with the austenite-to-martensite transformation.
Transformation to high strength martensite continues as deformation increases, as long as retained austenite (RA) is still available to be transformed. Optimal combinations of strength and ductility are obtained when the retained austenite stability is such that the transformation to martensite occurs gradually with increasing strain.
Alloys capable of the TRIP effect are characterized by a high ductility – high strength combination. Such alloys include 1st Gen AHSS TRIP steels, as well as several 3rd Gen AHSS grades like TRIP-Assisted Bainitic Ferrite, Carbide Free Bainite, and Quench & Partition Steels.
In these grades, increasing the stability of the retained austenite phase delays the austenite-to-martensite transformation to higher strain levels, further promoting formability improvements.
Several factors may promote higher RA stability, including additions of carbon (C) and manganese (Mn). Smaller austenite grains lower the martensite start temperature (Ms) and the number of martensite nucleation sites in each grain, and as such more energy (strain) is needed to start the transformation.
Additions of silicon (Si), chromium (Cr), and aluminum (Al) are also beneficial to achieving the TRIP effect since each of these elements suppress cementite (iron carbide, Fe3C) formation and thereby allows for carbon enrichment of austenite.
However, Mn, Si, Cr, and Al all form oxides on the steel surface that hinder galvanizing and paintability associated with the e-coat layer. Steelmakers typically choose an alloy development and processing strategy which minimizes the detrimental effects of these oxides.
Temperature also has an effect, not only from the paint-bake temperatures of approximately 170 °C, but from galvanizing at close to 500 °C. Citation Z-20 studied the effects of temperature on 0.1%C-5%Mn Medium Manganese steels and found that while tensile strength was relatively independent with temperature, ductility slightly decreases as the temperature is raised from room temperature to 400 °C, but drops off substantially by 500 °C. To retain the formability benefits associated with RA grades, the article recommends galvanizing at temperatures below 400 °C.
In addition to the paint-bake and galvanizing temperatures, adiabatic heating from forming (including shearing and stamping) impact properties. The temperature during forming can be influenced by the starting ambient temperature, the plastic energy dissipation, the latent heat of transformation and by conduction and convection to the environment.M-76
While deforming a metal, most of the energy is dissipated in the form of heat while only a small amount is stored. Austenite-to-martensite transformation kinetics are highly influenced by temperature, and the heating effects associated with mechanically-induced transformation can lead to a severe reduction in ductility.
The temperature rise due to dissipation is not negligible and since the TRIP effect is extremely sensitive to temperature, there is a need for a model to predict this behavior well. Such a model is described in Citation M-76, which reviews that retained austenite stability is a function of several parameters such as temperature; carbon content and alloying elements; austenite grain size and morphology; austenite grain orientation and distribution within the microstructure; and hydrostatic pressure.
Back to the Top
![Defining Steels]()
1stGen AHSS, AHSS, Steel Grades
Complex Phase (CP) steels combine high strength with relatively high ductility. The microstructure of CP steels contains small amounts of martensite, retained austenite and pearlite within a ferrite/bainite matrix. A thermal cycle that retards recrystallization and promotes Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), or Niobium (Nb) carbo-nitrides precipitation results in extreme grain refinement. Minimizing retained austenite helps improve local formability, since forming steels with retained austenite induces the TRIP effect producing hard martensite.F-11
The balance of phases, and therefore the properties, results from the thermal cycle, which itself is a function of whether the product is hot rolled, cold rolled, or produced using a hot dip process. Citation P-18 indicates that galvannealed CP steels are characterized by low yield value and high ductility, whereas cold rolled CP steels are characterized by high yield value and good bendability. Typically these approaches require different melt chemistry, potentially resulting in different welding behavior.
CP steel microstructure is shown schematically in Figure 1, with the grain structure for hot rolled CP 800/1000 shown in Figure 2. The engineering stress-strain curves for mild steel, HSLA steel, and CP 1000/1200 steel are compared in Figure 3.
Figure 1: Schematic of a complex phase steel microstructure showing martensite and retained austenite in a ferrite-bainite matrix.
Figure 2: Micrograph of complex phase steel, HR800Y980T-CP.C-14
Figure 3: A comparison of stress strain curves for mild steel, HSLA 350/450, and CP 1000/1200.
DP and TRIP steels do not rely on precipitation hardening for strengthening, and as a result, the ferrite in these steels is relatively soft and ductile. In CP steels, carbo-nitride precipitation increases the ferrite strength. For this reason, CP steels show significantly higher yield strengths than DP steels at equal tensile strengths of 800 MPa and greater. Engineering and true stress-strain curves for CP steel grades are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Engineering stress-strain (left graphic) and true stress-strain (right graphic) curves for a series of CP steel grades. Sheet thickness: CP650/850 = 1.5mm, CP 800/1000 = 0.8mm, CP 1000/1200 = 1.0mm, and Mild Steel = approx. 1.9mm.V-1
Whereas Dual Phase and TRIP steels excel at stretch forming and deep drawing, they are not as good in bending and cut-edge stretching. For applications needing these characteristics, complex phase steels are a good choice.
Table 1 compares galvannealed Dual Phase and Complex Phase steels having similar tensile strength and elongation as measured in a tensile test. The characteristics with the biggest difference are the yield strength and the hole expansion ratio which is a measure of cut-edge stretchability.
In the VDA-238 bending test, 980 DP exhibited a significant fracture with a bending angle of 67°. The 980 CP showed no fracture at 80°, and was capable of bending to over 100° before fracturing, Figure 5.N-33 The galvannealed 980 CP suppressed crack generation in axial crushing deformation to a much greater degree than the 980 DP.
Figure 5. Bendability of 980 DP (sample A) and 980 CP (sample B).N-33
Examples of typical automotive applications benefitting from these high strength steels with good local formability include frame rails, frame rail and pillar reinforcements, transverse beams, fender and bumper beams, rocker panels, and tunnel stiffeners.
Some of the specifications describing uncoated cold rolled 1st Generation complex phase (CP) steel are included below, with the grades typically listed in order of increasing minimum tensile strength and ductility. Different specifications may exist which describe hot or cold rolled, uncoated or coated, or steels of different strengths. Many automakers have proprietary specifications which encompass their requirements.
- ASTM A1088, with the terms Complex phase (CP) steel Grades 600T/350Y, 780T/500Y, and 980T/700Y A-22
- EN 10338, with the terms HCT600C, HCT780C, and HCT980C D-18
- VDA239-100, with the terms CR570Y780T-CP, CR780Y980T-CP, and CR900Y1180T-CPV-3
![Defining Steels]()
1stGen AHSS, AHSS, Steel Grades
Ferrite-Bainite (FB) steels are hot rolled steels typically found in applications requiring improved edge stretch capability, balancing strength and formability. The microstructure of FB steels contains the phases ferrite and bainite. High elongation is associated with ferrite, and bainite is associated with good edge stretchability. A fine grain size with a minimized hardness differences between the phases further enhance hole expansion performance. These microstructural characteristics also leads to improved fatigue strength relative to the tensile strength.
FB steels have a fine microstructure of ferrite and bainite. Strengthening comes from by both grain refinement and second phase hardening with bainite. Relatively low hardness differences within a fine microstructure promotes good Stretch Flangable (SF) and high hole expansion (HHE) performance, both measures of local formability. Figure 1 shows a schematic Ferrite-Bainite steel microstructure, with a micrograph of FB 400Y540T shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1: Schematic Ferrite-Bainite steel microstructure.
Figure 2: Micrograph of Ferrite-Bainite steel, HR400Y540T-FB.H-21
The primary advantage of FB steels over HSLA and DP steels is the improved stretchability of sheared edges as measured by the hole expansion test. Compared to HSLA steels with the same level of strength, FB steels also have a higher strain hardening exponent (n-value) and increased total elongation. Figure 3 compares FB 450/600 with HSLA 350/450 steel. Engineering and true stress-strain curves for FB steel grades are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3: A comparison of stress strain curves for mild steel, HSLA 350/450, and FB 450/600.
Figure 4: Engineering stress-strain (left graphic) and true stress-strain (right graphic) curve for FB 450/600.T-10
Examples of typical automotive applications benefitting from these high strength highly formable grades include automotive chassis and suspension parts such as upper and lower control arms, longitudinal beams, seat cross members, rear twist beams, engine sub-frames and wheels.
Some of the specifications describing uncoated hot rolled 1st Generation ferrite-bainite (FB) steel are included below, with the grades typically listed in order of increasing minimum tensile strength and ductility. Different specifications may exist which describe uncoated or coated versions of these grades. Many automakers have proprietary specifications which encompass their requirements.
- EN 10338, with the terms HDT450F and HDT580F D-18
- VDA239-100, with the terms HR300Y450T-FB, HR440Y580T-FB, and HR600Y780T-FB V-3
- JFS A2001, with the terms JSC440A and JSC590AJ-23
