K-58

Citation

K-58. Dongun Kim, POSCO, “Roll Stamping Technology for Automotive Gigasteel,” Presented at EWI Forming Center Advanced Sheet Metal Forming Technology Workshop on November 9th and 10th, 2021

About

About

About Us

WorldAutoSteel, the automotive group of the World Steel Association, is comprised of 18 major global steel producers from around the world. Our mission is to advance and communicate steel’s unique ability to meet the automotive industry’s needs and challenges in a sustainable and environmentally responsible way.

The AHSS Application Guidelines is a flagship project of WorldAutoSteel and its membership.  The new online database made available in 2021 marks the 7th edition of the Guidelines, which now will see continuous update via Blogs and new articles. The information available is the most comprehensive resource for the metallurgy, forming and joining of advanced steels in the world today. Meet the Guidelines team, below.

WorldAutoSteel operates in strict adherence with antitrust guidelines, a copy of which can be found on the World Steel Association website.

WorldAutoSteel Member Companies

The AHSS Application Guidelines are brought to you by 18 of the largest automotive steel suppliers in the world. Special thanks and recognition is given to our AHSS Guidelines Working Group, made up of our member company subject matter experts, who support the Guidelines with their world-class knowledge and input.

ansteel_logo
arcelormittal_logo
BAOWU_logo
CSC Steel logo
Erdemir logo
HBIS Group logo
Hyundai Steel logo
JFC Steel Corporation logo
JSW logo
Kobelco logo
Nippon Steel logo
Nucor logo
Posco logo
Tata Steel logo
Ternium logo
Usiminas logo
US Steel logo
Voetsalpine logo

Meet the Guidelines Team

Menachem Kimchi

Technical Author/Editor
Guidelines Joining Topics University Ohio State

Bio

Menachem Kimchi, M.Sc., brings years of production floor and research knowledge to update the AHSS Application Guidelines with the latest best practices in joining AHSS. Menachem is Associate Professor-Practice, Materials Science and Engineering, at Ohio State University.

Daniel Schaeffler

Technical Author/Editor
Guidelines Metallurgy & Forming Topics

Bio

Daniel J. Schaeffler, Ph.D., is passionate about training the metal stamping community on sheet formability and how to make the best use out of their chosen sheet metal grades. Danny is responsible for the Metallurgy and Forming sections of these AHSS Applications Guidelines. Danny is President, Engineering Quality Solutions, Inc., and Chief Content Officer, 4M Partners, LLC

George Coates

Technical Director, WorldAutoSteel
Guidelines Technical Oversight

Bio

George Coates is an integral part of the AHSS Guidelines technical team. He is responsible for guidance, steel application input, and integrating steel member subject matter expertise.

Cees ten Broek

Director
WorldAutoSteel

Bio

Cees ten Broek provides direction, facilitates steel member participation, and oversees all facets of the WorldAutoSteel Consortium. He leads the Team to identify and implement planning for value-added research and development programs.

Dean Kanelos

(Nucor)
Chairman, WorldAutoSteel

Bio

Along with WorldAutoSteel’s director, the leadership team, for which Dean Kanelos is Chairman, plays an important role in overseeing the program contents and progress to ensure alignment with the objectives of the greater membership.

Akira Usami

(Nippon Steel)
Vice Chairman, WorldAutoSteel

Bio

Along with WorldAutoSteel’s director, the leadership team, vice-chaired by Akira Usami, plays an important role in overseeing the program contents and progress to ensure alignment with the objectives of the greater membership.

Enno Arenholz

(voestalpine)
Vice Chairman, WorldAutoSteel

Bio

Along with WorldAutoSteel’s director, the leadership team, for which Enno Arenholz is a Vice Chair, plays an important role in overseeing the program contents and progress to ensure alignment with the objectives of the greater membership.

RSW Failure Prediction

RSW Failure Prediction

This article summarizes the findings of a paper entitled, “Prediction of Spot Weld Failure in Automotive Steels,”L-48 authored by J. H. Lim and J.W. Ha, POSCO, as presented at the 12th European LS-DYNA Conference, Koblenz, 2019.

To better predict car crashworthiness it is important to have an accurate prediction of spot weld failure. A new approach for prediction of resistance spot weld failure was proposed by POSCO researchers. This model considers the interaction of normal and bending components and calculating the stress by dividing the load by the area of plug fracture.

 

Background

Lee, et al.L-49 developed a model to predict spot welding failure under combined loading conditions using the following equation, based upon experimental results .

equation 1 Equation 1

 

Where FS and FN are shear and normal failure load, respectively, and n is a shape parameter.

Later, Wung and coworkersW-38 developed a model to predict the failure mode based upon the normal load, shear load, bending and torsion as shown in Equation 2.

equation 2 Equation 2

 

Here, FS, FN ,Mb and Mt are normal failure load, shear failure load, failure moment and failure torsion of spot weld, respectively.  α, β, γ and μ are shape parameters.

Seeger et al.S-106 proposed a model for failure criterion that describes a 3D polynomial failure surface. Spot weld failure occurs if the sum of the components of the normal, bending and shear stresses are above the surface, as shown in the Figure 1.

Figure 1. Spot weld failure model proposed by Seeger et al.S-106

Figure 1:  Spot weld failure model proposed by Seeger et al.S-106

 

The failure criterion can be expressed via Equation 3.

equation 3 Equation 3

 

Here, σN , σB , and τ are normal, bending and shear stress of the spot weld, respectively. And nN, nB and nc are the shape parameters. Toyota Motor CorporationL-50 has developed the stress-based failure model as shown in Equation 4.

equation 4 Equation 4

 

 

Hybrid Method to Determine Coefficients for Failure Models

This work used a unique hybrid method to determine the failure coefficients for modeling. The hybrid procedure steps are as follows:

  1. Failure tests are performed with respect to loading conditions.
  2. Finite element simulations are performed for each experiment.
  3. Based on the failure loads obtained in each test, the instant of onset of spot weld failure is determined. Failure loads are extracted comparing experiments with simulations.
  4. Post processing of those simulations gives the failure load components acting on spot welds such as normal, shear and bending loads.

These failure load components are plotted on the plane consisting of normal, shear and bending axes.

The hybrid method described above is shown in Figure 2.L-48

Figure 2:  Hybrid method to obtain the failure load with respect to test conditions.L-48

Figure 2:  Hybrid method to obtain the failure load with respect to test conditions.L-48

 

New Spot Weld Failure Model

The new proposed spot weld failure model in this paper considers only plug fracture mode as a normal spot weld failure. Secondly normal and bending components considered to be dependent upon each other. Stress generated by normal and bending components is shear, and shear component generates normal stress. Lastly authors have used πdt to calculate the area of stress instead of πd2/4. The final expression is shown in the Equation 5.

equation 5 Equation 5

 

Here τn is the shear stress by normal load components, σS is the normal stress due to shear load component. And , , c, α and β are coefficients.

This work included verification experiments of 42 kinds of homogenous steel stack-ups and 23 heterogeneous stack-ups. The strength levels of the steels used was between 270 MPa and 1500 MPa, and thickness between 0.55 mm and 2.3 mm. These experiments were used to evaluate the model and compare the results to the Wung model.

Conclusions

Overall, this new model considers interaction between normal and bending components as they have the same loading direction and plane. The current developed model was compared with the Wung model described above and has shown better results with a desirable error, especially for asymmetric material and thickness.